Gepato-gastroenterologik tadqiqotlar jurnali 2026 №1

Subject of the article

PERCUTANEOUS PUNCTURE-DRAINAGE PROCEDURES UNDER ULTRASOUND CONTROL FOR FLUID ACCUMULATIONS IN ACUTE PANCREATITIS (86-88)

Authors

Shavazi Ramiz Nuralievich, Ruziboev Sanjar Abdusalomovich, Ahrorov Mirzohon Murodovich

Institution

Samarkand State Medical University

Abstract

The objective of the study was to improve the results of treatment of patients with fluid collections in acute pancreatitis with a minimally invasive method. Material and methods. Results of percutaneous-puncture interventions under ultrasound in 62 patients with acute pancreatitis in the presence of fluid clusters were analyzed. In the first day from the moment of the disease, 39 % of patients admitted during the second and the third days - 31 % and more than three days - 20 % of patients. Results. Diagnostic punctures of fluid collections under ultrasound control were performed. In 49 (79 %) of 62 patients, the puncture was effectively transformed into percutaneous drainage. In 13 of 49 patients were further operated. Lethal outcomes after puncture-draining interventions were in 5 cases. Among 44 patients operated with a minimally invasive method of acute pancreatitis, recovery was noted in 24, recurrence of fluid collections - in 7, 13 patients were operated on. Conclusion. Thus, early diagnosis and timely implementation of conservative and minimally invasive methods of treatment contributed to improving the immediate results of treatment of patients with fluid collections in acute pancreatitis.

Key words

Keywords: acute pancreatitis, fluid collections, minimally invasive puncture-draining interventions

Literature

Список литературы/ Iqtiboslar / References 1. Bagnenko S. F. Ostryy pankreatit (protokoly diagnostici i lecheniya). Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2006;(1):60-67. (In Russ.). 2. Demin D. B., Tarasenko V. S., Kornilov S. A., Shchetinin N. A. Maloinvazivnaya khirurgiya pankreonekroza - uspekhi i problemy. Vestnik khirurgii im. I. I. Grekova. 2009;(5):55-58. (In Russ.). 3. Durlesther V. M., Andreev A. V., Kuznetsov Yu. S., Gabriel S. A., Goncharenko S. I. Primeneniye maloinvazivnykh khirurgicheskikh vmeshatel'stv v lechenii ostrogo destruktivnogo pankreatita. Vestnik khirurgicheskoi gastroenterologii. 2014;(3):33-37. (In Russ.). 4. Zurabiani V. G., Gavrilin A. V., Matveeva G. K., Danilov M. V. Otsenka effektivnosti minimal'no invazivnykh lechebnykh vmeshatel'stv u bol'nykh ostrym destruktivnym pankreatitom: obzor literatury. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2007;12(1):7-14. (In Russ.). 5. Kulezneva Yu. V., Okhotnikov O. I., Musaev G. Kh., Izrailov R. E., Brus-lik S. V., Grigoriev S. N., Moroz O. V. Chreskozhnoye vnutrenneye dre-nirovaniye postnekroticheskikh kist podzheludochnoy zhelezy. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2012;17(4):49-56. (In Russ.). 6. Jiang K., Huang W., Yang X. N., Xia Q. Present and future of prophylactic antibiotics for severe acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(3):279-284. 7. Lubyansky V. G., Nasonov V. V. Endoskopicheskoye chrezzheludochnoye drenirovaniye zhidkostnykh skopleniy i postnekroticheskikh kist pri ostrom pankreatite. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2015;(4):40-44. (In Russ.). 8. Vege S. S., Fletcher J. G., Talukdar R., Sarr M. G. Peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis: correlation between computerized tomography and operative findings. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(34):4291-4296. 9. Bollen T. L., Van Santvoort H. C., Besselink M. G. The Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis revisited. Br J Surg. 2008;9(1):6-21. 10. Mamoshin A. V., Gorpinich A. B., Vasiliev P. Yu., Borsukov A. V., Shatalov R. P., Alyanov A. L. Kristallograficheskiye osobennosti zhidko-stnykh obrazovaniy pri ostrom destruktivnom pankreatite. Ekspe-rimental'naya i klinicheskaya gastroenterologiya. 2012;(17):44-47. (In Russ.).