Биология ва тиббиёт муаммолари 2025, №3.1 (162)
Maqola mavzusi
MONITORING OF INFLAMMATORY MARKERS IN EARLY AND LATE POSTOPERATIVE PERIODS AFTER SURGICAL INTERVENTION FOR BENIGN VASCULAR NEOPLASMS OF THE NASAL CAVITY (119-121)
Mualliflar
Nematov Uktam Suyunovich, Lutfullaev Gairat Umrilloevich
Muassasa
Samarkand State Medical University, Republic of Uzbekistan, Samarkand
Annotatsiya
Surgical removal of benign vascular neoplasms of the nasal cavity represents one of the main therapeutic approaches for this pathology. At the same time, the postoperative period is often characterized by the development of inflammatory reactions of varying intensity, which potentially compromises the effectiveness of the treatment and negatively affects the patients' subjective well-being. The relevance of monitoring and regulating the severity of the inflammatory response after surgical intervention persists even today, despite significant advances in surgical techniques and the development of antimicrobial agents.
Kalit so'zlar
Benign vascular tumors, nasal cavity, postoperative inflammation, clinical manifestations, inflammation intensity, surgical treatment, hemangioma, angiofibroma, postoperative period, otorhinolaryngology.
Adabiyotlar
1. Alimdjanovich R. J., Saidolimovich K. A., Shavkatovna A. M. Complex rehabilitation of patients after bone reconstructive surgery in the facial and jaw area //British View. – 2022. – Т. 7. – №. 4. 2. Balakrishnan K, Castling D, McMahon J. Management strategies for recurrent nasal hemangiomas: a comprehen-sive review. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy. 2022;36(2):178-190. 3. Chen H, Zhao L, Yang X, et al. Oxidative stress mark-ers in surgical interventions for nasal vascular lesions. Ox-idative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2024;2024:8735921. 4. Dimitrijevic M, Arsic-Arsenijevic V, Dzamic A. Mi-crobiological aspects of postoperative wound healing in nasal cavity surgeries. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2022;164:105431. 5. El-Anwar MW, Hamed AA, Abdulmonem G, et al. Efficacy of Polydex in reducing post-operative inflamma-tion after endoscopic nasal surgeries. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2023;280(5):2145-2152. 6. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, et al. European Po-sition Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020;58(Suppl S29):1-464. 7. Guo X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. The role of antioxidant therapy in the treatment of inflammatory conditions after nasal surgery. International Immunopharmacology. 2022;102:108392. 8. Harris JP, Caldicott J, Croft CB. The measurement of nasal mucociliary clearance and ciliary beat frequency: a comparative study of techniques. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2021;46(3):512-521. 9. Ibraeva A, Rahimov C, Zhang Q. Traditional versus combined therapy approaches for benign vascular tumors of the nasal cavity. Journal of Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2024;12(1):32-41. 10. Kakiashvili D, Tahhan M, Letort G, et al. Vascular malformations of the nasal cavity: classification, diagnosis, and management. Head & Neck Pathology. 2022;16(2):397-410. 11. Kim YJ, Lee JH, Park J. Effects of fennel oil on mucociliary clearance after nasal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2023;71:102899. 12. Lloyd G, Howard D, Lund V, et al. Juvenile angiofibroma: modern approaches to a historically chal-lenging tumor. Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 2020;134(6):543-551. 13. Mahmoud F, Ibrahim A, El-Hamid SA, et al. Assess-ment of mucociliary clearance following different tech-niques of nasal surgery using saccharine test. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2022;88(5):695-701. 14. Tulyaganov N. A., Rizaev J. A., Agzamova S. S. Clini-cal Experience in Complex Treatment of Patients With Fractures of the Zygonoorbital Complex //International Journal of Integrative and Modern Medicine. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 12. – С. 358-366.